<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unsigned Rock Band Reviews &#124; myspacedotcom.com &#187; my heroine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/tag/my-heroine/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myspacedotcom.com</link>
	<description>The Unsigned Rock Band Reviews Website. Request review.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:34:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>My Heroine</title>
		<link>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/myheroin</link>
		<comments>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/myheroin#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all girl rock band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[female rock band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my heroine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myheroine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned band review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myspacedotcom.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsigned Band Review &#8211; My Heroine.
Band Name: My Heroine.
Myspace: www.myspace.com/myheroinemusic 

Reviewer: Keef

Review:
There&#8217;s no doubt that this is a group of good looking girls, but ugly people can make good records too&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..
So &#8211; what about the music?
The songs on the website are only excerpts &#8211; so hopefully they&#8217;ve chosen them wisely, as that&#8217;s what the review [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 style="text-align: center;">Unsigned Band Review &#8211; My Heroine.</h1>
<p><strong>Band Name: </strong>My Heroine.</p>
<p><strong>Myspace</strong>: <a href="http://www.myspace.com/myheroinemusic">www.myspace.com/myheroinemusic</a> <a title="www.myspace.com/southofsaturnuk" href="http://www.myspace.com/southofsaturnuk" target="_blank"></a><span style="font-family: Arial;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></span></p>
<p><strong>Reviewer: </strong>Keef<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_139" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 325px"><a href="http://www.myspace.com/myheroinemusic"><img class="size-full wp-image-139" title="My Heroine" src="http://myspacedotcom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/myHeroineWallpaper.jpg" alt="My Heroine" width="315" height="183" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">My Heroine</p></div>
<p><strong>Review:</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that this is a group of good looking girls, but ugly people can make good records too&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p><strong>So &#8211; what about the music?</strong></p>
<p>The songs on the website are only excerpts &#8211; so hopefully they&#8217;ve chosen them wisely, as that&#8217;s what the review is based on.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Mad&#8217; </strong>starts nicely enough, but I can&#8217;t help feeling that it doesn&#8217;t go anywhere in the chorus, such are the lack of dynamics in the song &#8211; shame &#8211; with some thought it could have been a nice song. (Don&#8217;t you love the word &#8216;nice&#8217;? Only used here to spite my primary school teachers who didn&#8217;t even believe it was a proper word!)</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Let it Go&#8217;</strong> has &#8217;studio track&#8217; written all over it! It sounds like a bunch of one line vocals cut and pasted over a backing track. Maybe I&#8217;m being harsh, but I&#8217;d imagine the &#8216;cut down&#8217; version that the band would have to perform live would have been a better effort to record than this overly complex version of what is quite a simple tune. Less is more guys &#8211; live vocals have far more feel than trying to get every line pitch perfect!</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Infatuation&#8217; </strong>GET IN!! Finally the engineer realises where the bass sliders are and/or decides to mic up the bass amp! This has got far more body to it, and the chorus finally shows the vocals off. I&#8217;m still not loving the feeling that some of the vocals have been dubbed a line at a time, as it really detracts from any sort of &#8216;live&#8217; feel &#8211; but overall, this is a vast improvement!</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Bitch&#8217; </strong>- couple of bits of wayward pitching &#8211; which is odd considering the care that is obviously given to the vocal recording otherwise &#8211; but it&#8217;s still a decent enough track that has the potential to really rock in the chorus &#8211; I can imagine that this would be a great track live.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Fever&#8217; </strong>- an old classic with a pretty reasonable twist. The production is far better on this track &#8211; so I&#8217;m guessing that this is/was the track designed to grab commercial interest. I&#8217;m still not crazy about all the overlaid vocals, but if it can be reproduced on stage, then consider me a fan!</p>
<p>Overall &#8211; think Strawberry Switchblade and you won&#8217;t be far off the mark.<br />
It&#8217;s hardly original, but I&#8217;ve heard far worse from far uglier people&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d certainly like to go and see these live, as I reckon the studio perhaps isn&#8217;t doing them justice&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Keef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/myheroin/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

