<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unsigned Rock Band Reviews &#124; myspacedotcom.com &#187; band review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/tag/band-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myspacedotcom.com</link>
	<description>The Unsigned Rock Band Reviews Website. Request review.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:34:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Burning Circle</title>
		<link>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/burning-circle</link>
		<comments>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/burning-circle#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal band reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock band reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned band]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myspacedotcom.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsigned Band Review &#8211; Burning Circle
Band Name: Burning Circle
Myspace: http://www.myspace.com/theburningcircleoflife
Reviewer: Keef



















Review:
Their influences read like a &#8216;who&#8217;s who&#8217; of classic rock legends. And right from the first vocal, you can see why. OK, so the timekeeping might not be 100% perfect, but if you have an ounce of rock in your body and ears that haven&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 style="text-align: center;">Unsigned Band Review &#8211; Burning Circle</h1>
<p><strong>Band Name: </strong>Burning Circle</p>
<p><strong>Myspace</strong>: <a href="http://www.myspace.com/theburningcircleoflife">http://www.myspace.com/theburningcircleoflife</a></p>
<p><strong>Reviewer: </strong>Keef<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<div>
<dl id="attachment_139" style="width: 325px;">
<dt>
<div>
<dl id="attachment_163" style="width: 375px;">
<dt>
<div>
<dl id="attachment_169" style="width: 310px;">
<dt>
<div id="attachment_180" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 373px"><a href="http://www.myspace.com/theburningcircleoflife"><img class="size-medium wp-image-180  " title="Burning Circle" src="http://myspacedotcom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/burningcircle-300x187.png" alt="Burning Circle" width="363" height="226" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Burning Circle</p></div>
</dt>
</dl>
</div>
</dt>
</dl>
</div>
</dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p><strong>Review:</strong></p>
<p>Their influences read like a &#8216;who&#8217;s who&#8217; of classic rock legends. And right from the first vocal, you can see why. OK, so the timekeeping might not be 100% perfect, but if you have an ounce of rock in your body and ears that haven&#8217;t been permanently damaged from turning it up to eleven, you&#8217;ve got to admire the absolute talent in the lead vocals!</p>
<p>I have to say I was particularly blown away by the more baladdy (that is now a word) tracks. There&#8217;s a fine line to be drawn between a piss take classic rock voice and a REAL classic rock voice and &#8216;Sale&#8217; has an almost perfect &#8216;classic&#8217; rock voice that would have graced any band from the list that the band cites as their influences! Honestly!</p>
<p>The music is a cross between classic 70s anthemic rock and the more edgy metal that came to the fore about 5 years ago. Cultural differences aside (this band originates in the former Eastern Block), &#8216;Burning Circle&#8217; would have no problem selling their music anywhere in the world. No review would be complete without a critisism, but all I can really fault is the slightly lax timekeeping (can&#8217;t you tell I&#8217;m a drummer) in the odd section and the fact that some of the vocals highlight the fact that English is not these guys&#8217; first languege, so the lyrics sound a bit contrived and don&#8217;t make 100% sense. Other than that, it gets my approval!  Well done guys!</p>
<p>Keef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/burning-circle/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outrageous Rhinoceros</title>
		<link>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/outrageous-rhinoceros</link>
		<comments>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/outrageous-rhinoceros#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grindcore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outrageous Rhinoceros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychedelic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned bands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myspacedotcom.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsigned Band Review &#8211; Outrageous Rhinoceros
Band Name: Outrageous Rhinoceros
Myspace: www.myspace.com/outrageousrhinoceros
Reviewer: Keef





Review:
I guess when the band&#8217;s &#8216;Sounds Like&#8217; list doesn&#8217;t include anyone that  you&#8217;ve ever heard of, it&#8217;s not the very best of places to start  from.
They describe themselves as &#8220;Psychedelic / Rock / Grindcore&#8221;, but all I got was more  Angle Grinder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1 style="text-align: center;">Unsigned Band Review &#8211; Outrageous Rhinoceros</h1>
<p><strong>Band Name: </strong>Outrageous Rhinoceros</p>
<p><strong>Myspace</strong>: <a href="http://www.myspace.com/outrageousrhinoceros">www.myspace.com/outrageousrhinoceros</a></p>
<p><strong>Reviewer: </strong>Keef</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 318px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.myspace.com/outrageousrhinoceros"><img title="Outrageous Rhinoceros" src="http://c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/30/l_5c0946feb5084aaba7222e5de82ca1d9.jpg" alt="Outrageous Rhinoceros" width="308" height="302" /></a></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p><strong>Review:</strong></p>
<p>I guess when the band&#8217;s &#8216;Sounds Like&#8217; list doesn&#8217;t include anyone that  you&#8217;ve ever heard of, it&#8217;s not the very best of places to start  from.</p>
<p>They describe themselves as &#8220;Psychedelic / Rock / Grindcore&#8221;, but all I got was more  Angle Grinder than &#8216;Grindcore&#8217;.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s yet another one of  those genre pidgeonholes that people make up when they&#8217;re trying desperatley not  to get themselves put into any other  pidgeonholes.</p>
<p><strong>Anyway &#8211; what about the music?</strong></p>
<p>The first track, &#8216;Peanut City&#8217; comes right out of nowhere, <strong>shows immense  promise and really rips along</strong> &#8211; but it sort of wanders around after the first  few bars, not exactly going anywhere new.</p>
<p>The overall feel of the track is &#8216;confusing&#8217; &#8211; I say that because it just  becomes a bit of a hash of different time signatures which, unless done  perfectly, just sound like poor timing and a desperate attempt to make the music  more intersting than it actually is.   Don&#8217;t get me wrong, there&#8217;s some great riff ideas in there &#8211; but it  seriously sounds like they picked about half a dozen of their favourite  practice jam tunes and then just threw them together, with no real thought about  how the overall track suffers as a result &#8211; which is quite badly, in all  honesty&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8216;Pete Around the Bush&#8217; is the other track sent for review.</p>
<p>Now, we&#8217;ve all played in bands where we&#8217;ve downtuned guitars for songs,  whether that&#8217;s for a vocal pitching issue, to make a particular guitar part less  difficult, or just because we wanted to &#8211; but I always got the idea that  everyone tuned down to the same key?   Seems that the guys forgot this &#8211; and we&#8217;ve got a whole bunch of guitars  all doing their individual thing as the start to this  song.</p>
<p>It kind of settles down for the dominant riff, but there&#8217;s either some  tuning issues or a lack of understanding of harmonies going on pretty much  throughout the whole song, making what could have been a decent enough tune  sound &#8216;wrong&#8217;.</p>
<p>Now &#8211; live, it might be a different matter, but when you&#8217;re  listening to a recording, it&#8217;s easy to be more picky &#8211; and on the strength of  two tracks, it&#8217;s hard to get a feel as to whether this tuning is a deliberate  thing or not.   Again, we have the overly complicated time signature changes which don&#8217;t  really add any relevance to anything and show up even the slightest timing  issues.</p>
<p>OK &#8211; overall, this isn&#8217;t the worst thing I&#8217;ve ever heard &#8211; but neither is  it the best example of this music I&#8217;ve ever listened  to.</p>
<p>The vocals, whilst trying hard to emulate Joe Alselmo in the shouting  stakes, don&#8217;t do anything other than that &#8211; and when the guitars are doing their  weird &#8216;off-key&#8217; thing in the background, it makes the shouting even less  appealing. AT least with Pantera, there were some far more tuneful moments that  made the contrast between the two forms hit off each other and  &#8216;work&#8217;.</p>
<p>The musicianship from the rest of the band is OK &#8211; not the tightest, but  a lot of that is only really highlighted by the mish-mash of time signatures in  each song and will only improve with time.</p>
<p>My advice would be to rip that first song to shreds and take the dozen or  so promising ideas and make them individual tracks.</p>
<p>Calm down with the 23/57 time signatures that change every couple of  bars, as even headbanging needs a rhythm to go along to, try to mix up those  vocals and make sure you REALLY listen to how the guitars interact with each  other and with the vocals&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Keef</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://myspacedotcom.com/unsigned-bands-reviews/outrageous-rhinoceros/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

